Re-Examining the CEO Reputation Factor
We once had a Fortune 500 client with a CEO who
said, “ I don’t care what the media says about me or how I get quoted, as long
as my name gets into the newspapers and magazines.” The company he
chaired was a Makovsky client for 18 years, and his quote always resonated in
my head. We knew he liked publicity, but was this going too far?
Now
comes a study
with an answer. It notes that there is a strong relationship between CEO
media tone and overall company media tone. Thus, if the CEO is getting
mostly negative publicity, it is very hard to get positive coverage on the
organization as a whole.
“The
opposite is also true,” notes Nicole Lee, a master’s student at San Diego State
University, who conducted the study. “If an organization is regularly
bashed in the media, its CEO would likely struggle to maintain a positive
reputation.”
Nicole’s
research was sponsored by the Institute for PR, an independent non-profit group
that focuses on research that matters to the practice.
Her
study also notes that the topics one links with the CEO can positively or
negatively affect his or her reputation. For example, the study says
stories about corporate social responsibility or organizational strategy are
closely related to a CEO’s reputation, whereas the tone of stories about an
organization’s financial performance or products, with coverage not connected
to the CEO, “has no significant relationship to a CEO’s media
reputation.” While I have not seen the data supporting this study, I
question the accuracy of the latter statement. Case in point: Jamie
Dimon, CEO of JPMorgan Chase.
Nevertheless,
as you plan strategy for a positive media visibility campaign covering both the
CEO and the organization, think carefully about topical associations.
Labels: communications, Makovsky, Public Relations
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home